AI answers that can face an auditor.
For healthcare, finance, legal and public-sector work, Qriton keeps sources, the model version and human approval together, and refuses to answer when the evidence is not there.
Contested decisions need their evidence.
General assistants answer confidently even when the evidence is missing, and patient, client and case files cannot be sent to someone else’s cloud.
Under the EU AI Act, high-risk systems will need logging, transparency and human oversight that can be shown, not just described.
What changes.
Cited or refused
Only what your approved sources support reaches a decision.
Human approval
Cases above your thresholds go to a named reviewer.
Audit record
Sources, reviewer and outcome, kept in a tamper-evident record for later review.
How it works.
Ground
Qriton KB answers only from your approved sources, with citations.
Assess
Qriton KB checks whether your sources support an answer and declines when they do not.
Review
Low-confidence or consequential cases go to a person for approval.
Record
The exchange is written to a hash-chained audit log that authorised reviewers can check later.