“Russia is not my enemy”

Russia is not my enemy.

  • ENRussia is not my enemy
  • RORusia nu este dușmanul meu
  • ITLa Russia non è il mio nemico
  • FRLa Russie n'est pas mon ennemi
  • DERussland ist nicht mein Feind
  • NLRusland is niet mijn vijand
  • PLRosja nie jest moim wrogiem
  • ESRusia no es mi enemigo
  • RUРоссия нам не враг
Explore the network →

Influence Operations Below the Threshold

Hopfield-Enhanced Anomaly Detection in the “Russia Is Not Our Enemy” Campaign

A. Martinescu & M. Dima
Part IThe TikTok Observatory corpus

Context and scope

This report examines the circulation of the slogan “Russia is not my enemy” as an overarching, multi-platform campaign. Its state-linked layer is coordinated and in part automated: one machine-translated text appeared on fourteen sites of a single network within four minutes, and five Telegram channels published an identical text within the same minute. Its mass layer, by contrast, consists largely of established accounts replicating a template. The analysis therefore distinguishes throughout between coordination that the data document and replication that they do not attribute.

The first part rests on the TikTok corpus of the iGov Observatory. Collection commenced on 24 August 2026. An audit account, configured for a defined demographic profile and geolocated in Europe, was positioned to record the feed that the platform’s recommender system serves to that profile. The exercise was conducted within the SPINE European consortium; its scope was to assess how narratives propagate to diasporic audiences.

Part I inventories the Observatory corpus and examines it along the dimensions used in our earlier analyses (frequency, distribution, cross-platform propagation and comment dynamics), then relates the observed behaviours to the signals through which recommender systems allocate visibility. Part II turns to the multi-platform dataset (X, Facebook, Telegram, web) and retains the network analysis. The Observatory’s repository of the items referred to is appended.

The corpus records what one audit profile was served. It is not a sample of the platform, and no figure in Part I should be read as an estimate of prevalence.

24 Augustcollection commenced, 2026
36capture days, to 28 September
264accounts in the feed served to the audit profile

Inventory of the corpus

Between 24 August and 28 September 2026 the Observatory archived 3,624 unique posts from 264 accounts over 36 capture days: 3,558 videos and 66 photo posts. Metadata are complete for 2,673 posts, partial for 796 and could not be retrieved for 155. An enrichment layer (transcript, on-screen text, narratives, entities) is available for 2,608 posts. 2,474 posts belong to the 31 daily cases that have been verified and published in the Observatory’s bulletins; the remainder are archived but not yet verified.

At capture, the 3,432 posts with engagement data had accumulated 40.9 million views, 3.79 million likes, 404,335 shares, 245,831 comments and 169,452 saves.

Relevance to the theme was assigned by transparent text patterns in nine languages: tier A, the slogan itself (5 posts); tier B, the same frame without the slogan (32); tier C, contexts in which Russia and Romania, or enemy language aimed at a country, appear together (309). For these 346 posts every public comment thread was retrieved: on 29 September 2026 the platform reported 58,452 comments, of which 48,249 could be read, written by 33,316 accounts.

3,624unique posts archived
40.9mviews at capture
346theme-related posts: 5 A, 32 B, 309 C

Language of the posts

Romanian1,559 · 62%
Russian872 · 35%
English374 · 15%
Italian30 · 1%
German30 · 1%
Spanish28 · 1%

Of 2,520 posts with an identified language; a post may carry more than one.

Screening categories

Russia-related state, leader, or national messaging927
Sovereignty, nationalism, and patriotic identity859
Electoral, candidate, and party mobilization575
War, military, mobilization, and security454
Protest and civic mobilization377
Culture, music, sport, and symbolic soft power365
Economic status, cost, and grievance claims240
Religion, history, and civilizational identity229
EU, NATO, or Western-institution references131

Of 1,781 posts with at least one category. The categories are criteria for navigation and triage, not findings of influence, falsity or coordination.

Frequency

The archive grew unevenly: the median capture day holds 74.5 posts (interquartile range 31–157), and the busiest day, 11 September, holds 307.

  • Other posts
  • Theme-related, tier C
  • Tiers A and B

The feed is recent. Of the 3,537 posts with a known publication date, 62.5% were captured on the day of publication and a further 25.6% on the following day; only 41 were more than thirty days old, the oldest 88.

Supply is persistent rather than episodic. 22 accounts recur on ten or more of the 36 capture days, while 117 appear once. The most prolific account contributes 598 posts, an average of 16.6 per capture day.

Theme-related posts are a steady minority: 346 of 3,624 (9.5%); tiers A and B together number 37.

62.5%of posts captured on the day of publication
22accounts recurring on ten or more capture days
9.5%of the archive is theme-related

Distribution

Posts are concentrated in few accounts: the most active account supplies 16.5% of the archive, the five most active 35.3%, the ten most active 47.9%; 17 accounts contribute fifty posts or more.

Attention is more concentrated still. The median post had 708 views at capture (interquartile range 331–2,840); 59.2% had fewer than 1,000 views and 105 had more than 100,000. The top one per cent of posts account for 34.3% of all views and the top ten per cent for 86.9%; the ten most-viewed accounts hold 42.0%.

Formats are short: the median duration is 45 seconds (interquartile range 20–82), and 67.1% of posts run for a minute or less.

Theme-related posts reach further and draw more comment than the rest of the archive: a median of 1,673 views against 665, and 7.66 comments per 1,000 views against 5.72. Shares are level (9.85 against 9.88) and saves lower (3.11 against 4.31).

47.9%of posts come from the ten most active accounts
86.9%of views go to the top ten per cent of posts
708views for the median post, at capture
PostsNumberViews, medianLikesCommentsSharesSaves
Whole corpus3,42970892.56.009.874.14
Not related to the theme3,08366591.35.729.884.31
Theme-related (A, B, C)3461,67399.57.669.853.11
Tiers A and B374,17194.67.269.582.91

Likes, comments, shares and saves: per 1,000 views, at capture. Posts with at least one view are counted.

Cross-platform propagation

Within the posts themselves, traces of other platforms are rare: 64 posts (1.8%) mention or display another platform in the caption, the on-screen text or the transcript, chiefly Facebook (33), WhatsApp (15) and YouTube (10); Telegram appears in 5. No media file is identical, byte for byte, between accounts: of 2,608 files with a computed fingerprint none recurs. A file fingerprint therefore identifies no re-upload in this corpus; footage that has been re-encoded would not be detected by it.

The frame precedes the chain. Of the 37 posts in tiers A and B, 30 were published before 21 September, the day the nationality chain began on X, the earliest on 18 July; 7 were published from that date. The slogan itself (tier A) appears on 2 August, on 9 and 17 September, and then on 21 and 26 September.

On TikTok the frame circulates in a local form, in which the enemy named becomes Ukraine or the European Union, and the comment formulas follow the Romanian news calendar rather than the chain on X. The next section lists the videos concerned; the daily series of comments is given further below.

Other platforms, in the TikTok posts

Facebook33
WhatsApp15
YouTube10
Telegram5
Rumble / VK / OK3
Instagram3
30A/B posts published before 21 September, of 37
0media files identical between accounts

The pro-Russia TikTok cluster, in the network →

A/B videos in the TikTok Observatory’s public bulletins

Comment dynamics

The 346 threads hold 48,249 retrievable comments: 43,819 top-level and 4,430 replies (9.2%). Activity is concentrated: the ten largest threads hold 41.1% of all comments, while the median thread has 13. Between archiving and 29 September the count reported by the platform rose from 45,748 to 58,452.

Comments arrive early. Measured from each video’s publication, 53.2% were written within 24 hours, 72.6% within three days and 81.3% within a week; 4.8% came after more than thirty days.

They are brief. The median comment has 2 words; 59.0% have three words or fewer and 35.4% consist only of emoji or symbols. 276 texts are used verbatim by three or more authors and account for 2,557 comments (5.3%). Approval is unevenly distributed: 55.5% of comments received no like, and the top one per cent received 43.4% of all likes. Creators themselves liked 10,368 comments (21.5%).

The audience overlaps between accounts. Of 33,316 commenters, 25,624 wrote a single comment; 5,107 (15.3%) commented under two or more accounts and 553 under four or more, the maximum being 13. A commenter active under several accounts is a lead to verify, not a finding of coordination.

53.2%of comments within 24 hours of publication
35.4%emoji or symbols only
15.3%of commenters active under two or more accounts

  • Comments collected
  • Replies collected
  • Counted by TikTok, not publicly visible

What the comments on the theme say

Under how many different accounts the same person comments

The same words, from different people

The formulas, in the network →

Comments per day, by date written

Behaviours that raise visibility in recommender systems

TikTok states that its recommendations draw on user interactions (“the videos you like or share, accounts you follow, comments you post”), on video information (“captions, sounds, and hashtags”) and on device and account settings (“language preference, country setting, and device type”). Watching a longer video to the end is described as a strong indicator of interest, and follower count is not a direct factor (TikTok, How TikTok recommends videos #ForYou, 18 June 2020). The Digital Services Act requires online platforms to set out the main parameters of their recommender systems (Regulation (EU) 2022/2065, Article 27) and very large platforms to assess systemic risks, including those stemming from the design of such systems (Article 34).

The table sets the behaviours observed in the corpus against those signals. The correspondences are structural: the corpus cannot show why a given item was recommended.

BehaviourIn the corpusSignal stated by the platform
High-frequency posting by few accountsTen accounts supply 47.9% of posts; one posts 16.6 times per capture day.Not a stated factor in itself. Follower count is stated not to be a direct factor, which leaves volume available to accounts of any size.
Recency88.0% of posts were captured within one day of publication.Not among the stated factors; it describes what the feed served.
Short formatsMedian duration 45 seconds; 67.1% of a minute or less.Completion of a longer video is described as a strong indicator of interest; whether completion of short items carries the same weight is not stated.
Generic discovery hashtags628 posts (17.3% of the archive) carry #fyp, #viral, #foryoupage or similar.Hashtags are part of the video information.
Shared sounds721 posts use a named sound; 33 sounds recur across three or more accounts (148 posts).Sounds are part of the video information.
Short, repeated commentsMedian comment of 2 words; 35.4% emoji only; 5.3% in formulas used by three or more authors.Comments posted are a stated user interaction; the published description does not distinguish them by content.
Early comments53.2% of comments within the first 24 hours.Comments posted are a stated factor; their timing is not addressed in the published description.
Creators liking commentsCreators liked 21.5% of comments.Not a stated factor.
Overlapping audiences15.3% of commenters are active under two or more accounts; 553 under four or more.Accounts followed and comments posted are stated factors; a user who comments under several of these accounts supplies that signal for each.
Shares and saves9.9 shares and 4.1 saves per 1,000 views.Videos liked or shared are user interactions.
Language and locationRomanian 61.9%, Russian 34.6%, English 14.8% of the posts with an identified language.Language preference and country setting are stated factors; the feed reflects the configuration of the audit profile.
Theme-related itemsMedian views 2.5 times those of the rest of the archive; 34% more comments per 1,000 views.Likes, shares and comments are stated factors; on the theme the corpus shows higher comment rates and level share rates.
Part IIThe multi-platform dataset and the network

Composition of the dataset

The multi-platform dataset holds 8,872 posts published between 1 August and 29 September 2026 and returned by a single English-language query (“Russia is/are not my/our enemy”): X 7,758 (87.4%), Facebook 724, Telegram 264, web 71, VK 41, and a handful from TikTok and YouTube. 5,335 are reposts, 2,605 comments and 760 original posts, from 4,638 accounts.

The sections below follow the phrase through that dataset: the timeline, the nationality chain, amplification by state-affiliated accounts, the targets and the coordination test. The network explorer retains the full relational structure, and each “in the network” link opens the corresponding view.

The network explorer →
8,872posts, 1 August – 29 September 2026
87.4%of them on X
60.1%reposts

  • Reposts
  • Comments
  • Original posts
  • Articles, messages, videos

The nationality chain: “I’m [nationality] and Russia is not my enemy”

See the chain in the network →

Posts declaring a nationality, by country first seen

By day

See the embassy in the network →

Accounts labelled as affiliated with the Russian state

The Pravda compilations, in the network →

Most reposted public accounts

Targets: the slogan in replies to Western officials’ posts

See the replies in the network →

The enemy named in Russia’s place

The phrase rarely comes alone. The same posts take other countries off the enemy list and name an enemy “within” instead.

“[X] is not my/our enemy”: who is X

Who is named the real enemy

AnnexRepository and method

The Observatory repository

The Observatory publishes each verified daily case as a bulletin, with the archived item, its transcript and its screening record. Of the 346 theme-related posts, 231 are in published bulletins and are listed below with a link to their record; the remaining 115 are archived but not yet verified, and are not listed. Accounts are named here because the items are already public in the Observatory. Inclusion in the list shows that a post matched a text pattern; it is not a finding about the account, its intent or any coordination.

The Observatory’s bulletins →
PublishedCapturedTierAccountViewsCommentsObservatory
2 Aug28 AugA@suntsuveranpinamor41,90069record ↗
17 Sep21 SepA@skisortv17,600643record ↗
9 Sep11 SepA@russia_with_putin90028record ↗
12 Aug11 SepB@kalinkarossii364,1001,409record ↗
9 Sep11 SepB@kalinkarossii120,100528record ↗
28 Jul28 AugB@gheto_dacul69,000102record ↗
8 Sep11 SepB@kalinkarossii37,400207record ↗
19 Aug21 SepB@user23978723725,700766record ↗
22 Aug24 AugB@mihaela.ungheanu7124,500512record ↗
8 Sep11 SepB@kalinkarossii20,100135record ↗
19 Sep19 SepB@kalinkarossii8,97636record ↗
18 Jul21 SepB@user2397872378,414379record ↗
24 Aug16 SepB@anonymous.t.m4,530155record ↗
20 Sep20 SepB@kalinkarossii4,49413record ↗
10 Sep11 SepB@prundurel.emil_ce4,17122record ↗
12 Sep12 SepB@kalinkarossii3,29110record ↗
6 Sep11 SepB@aurelchina3692,838106record ↗
17 Sep18 SepB@kalinkarossii2,15115record ↗
12 Sep13 SepB@kalinkarossii1,5878record ↗
19 Sep19 SepB@kalinkarossii1,54810record ↗
16 Sep16 SepB@kalinkarossii1,5335record ↗
18 Sep18 SepB@kalinkarossii1,3538record ↗
22 Sep22 SepB@liudmilamayer1,31128record ↗
12 Sep12 SepB@kalinkarossii8952record ↗
18 Sep19 SepB@kalinkarossii8357record ↗
10 Sep11 SepB@iftimie.manole481930record ↗
15 Sep16 SepB@user3632210056005record ↗
19 Sep20 SepB@kalinkarossii4922record ↗
16 Sep17 SepB@kalinkarossii3526record ↗
19 Sep20 SepB@kalinkarossii1820record ↗
2 Sep2 SepB@8888_angel350record ↗
20 Aug21 SepC@psihologzahariacristina482,7004,084record ↗
8 Sep11 SepC@1piromanul351,300811record ↗
22 Aug24 AugC@danielfiudedac331,9001,747record ↗
30 Aug11 SepC@russia_with_putin283,0004,512record ↗
23 Aug28 AugC@andi.cosmin173,500363record ↗
19 Aug24 AugC@mtudorep147,5001,148record ↗
18 Aug24 AugC@lav_lavinia_24120,6003,172record ↗
19 Aug28 AugC@codrutv119,200312record ↗
21 Sep22 SepC@geanina.peter74,8001,033record ↗
28 Jul24 AugC@skisortv.rus72,2001,614record ↗
26 Aug28 AugC@helios.app70,200383record ↗
20 Jul24 AugC@sophianewsplus65,000413record ↗
21 Aug28 AugC@matrixclub0160,500197record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@ghitaboca1548,000214record ↗
22 Sep22 SepC@andreea_promo45,7001,249record ↗
21 Sep21 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce43,100287record ↗
21 Aug28 AugC@matrixclub0143,000103record ↗
19 Aug24 AugC@florin.38642,000703record ↗
28 Aug30 AugC@melodiamea937,10095record ↗
21 Jun24 AugC@user23978723732,700856record ↗
14 Sep16 SepC@blackrock27326,200459record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce24,80057record ↗
5 Sep5 SepC@calin.georgescu.real19,200404record ↗
20 Aug24 AugC@mihaela.ungheanu7118,000606record ↗
27 Aug28 AugC@sophianewsplus17,80026record ↗
19 Sep20 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce17,40046record ↗
9 Sep16 SepC@user23978723716,700450record ↗
8 Sep11 SepC@geanina.peter16,400124record ↗
7 Sep8 SepC@calin.georgescu.real15,200302record ↗
22 Aug21 SepC@lucastefanzoltan14,800109record ↗
20 Sep21 SepC@diana.i.sosoaca.official14,000123record ↗
25 Aug28 AugC@sophianewsplus11,40011record ↗
17 Sep17 SepC@cristinabianca8711,10046record ↗
17 Aug21 SepC@user23978723711,100635record ↗
21 Sep22 SepC@cristinabianca8710,70092record ↗
14 Sep16 SepC@user23978723710,300315record ↗
15 Sep15 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce9,47267record ↗
18 Aug24 AugC@8888_angel8,9440record ↗
30 Jun24 AugC@luciarusu898,811192record ↗
22 Sep22 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce8,08012record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@sophianewsplus7,97315record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@daniilnicoaraa7,94477record ↗
20 Sep20 SepC@sophianewsplus7,63918record ↗
9 Sep11 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce7,27928record ↗
21 Sep22 SepC@sophianewsplus7,10138record ↗
9 Sep11 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce6,88942record ↗
14 Sep14 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce6,87545record ↗
14 Sep15 SepC@sophianewsplus6,42542record ↗
27 Aug28 AugC@sophianewsplus5,46311record ↗
10 Sep11 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce5,3558record ↗
18 Sep19 SepC@user3632210055,0667record ↗
28 Aug29 AugC@sophianewsplus5,0166record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@victhorpvr4,94526record ↗
18 Sep18 SepC@gs.cg04,7523record ↗
17 Sep17 SepC@geanina.peter4,49822record ↗
18 Sep19 SepC@sophianewsplus4,4106record ↗
10 Sep11 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce4,17115record ↗
1 Sep2 SepC@sophianewsplus4,0833record ↗
9 Sep11 SepC@ana.iv.164,02758record ↗
22 Sep22 SepC@cristinabianca873,80619record ↗
13 Sep13 SepC@sophianewsplus3,6637record ↗
15 Sep15 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce3,4469record ↗
28 Jun21 SepC@dy033zen7oh5florin3,42386record ↗
20 Sep21 SepC@sophianewsplus3,3345record ↗
16 Sep16 SepC@gs.cg03,26917record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@geanina.peter3,20019record ↗
17 Sep17 SepC@geanina.peter3,11913record ↗
14 Sep15 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce2,8822record ↗
16 Sep18 SepC@cristinabianca872,6274record ↗
1 Sep2 SepC@sophianewsplus2,3743record ↗
18 Sep19 SepC@sophianewsplus2,3501record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@user3632210052,31813record ↗
11 Sep11 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce2,1927record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@geanina.peter2,00830record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@geanina.peter2,00722record ↗
11 Sep11 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,96910record ↗
11 Sep12 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,9575record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@user3632210051,9028record ↗
17 Sep18 SepC@sophianewsplus1,8992record ↗
21 Sep22 SepC@user3632210051,88335record ↗
12 Sep12 SepC@geanina.peter1,88211record ↗
10 Sep11 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,8326record ↗
20 Sep20 SepC@petronelfilipciu51,82116record ↗
5 Sep6 SepC@sophianewsplus1,7294record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,7127record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@cristinabianca871,6962record ↗
14 Sep14 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,6686record ↗
20 Sep20 SepC@user3632210051,64710record ↗
19 Sep21 SepC@cocojambo.w1,61438record ↗
10 Sep10 SepC@lucastefanzoltan1,5097record ↗
15 Sep16 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,4926record ↗
9 Sep11 SepC@daniilnicoaraa1,45341record ↗
22 Sep22 SepC@geanina.peter1,4436record ↗
12 Sep12 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,3671record ↗
18 Sep18 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,2793record ↗
16 Sep17 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,2754record ↗
22 Sep22 SepC@user3632210051,2496record ↗
12 Sep12 SepC@haurtradatorideneam1,1935record ↗
20 Sep20 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,1034record ↗
20 Sep20 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,0611record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@cristinabianca871,0318record ↗
3 Sep3 SepC@sophianewsplus1,0272record ↗
11 Sep11 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce1,0083record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@user3632210059425record ↗
14 Sep14 SepC@gs.cg09370record ↗
16 Sep16 SepC@sophianewsplus9358record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@user3632210059213record ↗
20 Sep20 SepC@geanina.peter90413record ↗
14 Sep14 SepC@gs.cg08910record ↗
17 Sep18 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce8802record ↗
5 Sep5 SepC@sophianewsplus8369record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@brigada.mn8062record ↗
22 Sep22 SepC@brigada.mn7871record ↗
14 Sep16 SepC@lenutavranceanu775613record ↗
14 Sep15 SepC@gs.cg07558record ↗
14 Sep15 SepC@gs.cg07555record ↗
16 Sep16 SepC@gs.cg07450record ↗
14 Sep15 SepC@gs.cg07445record ↗
1 Sep1 SepC@sophianewsplus7400record ↗
15 Sep15 SepC@vocesiritm7381record ↗
9 Sep11 SepC@simonacovasda73514record ↗
17 Sep17 SepC@prundurel.emil_ce7165record ↗
26 Aug26 AugC@sophianewsplus7041record ↗
30 Aug30 AugC@melodiamea96973record ↗
7 Sep7 SepC@sophianewsplus6884record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@user3632210056882record ↗
17 Sep18 SepC@georgiana.e396802record ↗
17 Sep18 SepC@daniilnicoaraa67812record ↗
10 Sep10 SepC@sophianewsplus6573record ↗
25 Aug25 AugC@sophianewsplus6551record ↗
16 Sep16 SepC@anaancuta16470record ↗
21 Sep22 SepC@ghitaboca156473record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@user3632210056413record ↗
11 Sep11 SepC@sophianewsplus63812record ↗
2 Sep3 SepC@sophianewsplus6132record ↗
3 Sep3 SepC@makaveli.net5791record ↗
11 Sep12 SepC@user3632210055503record ↗
20 Sep21 SepC@valentina.007.ro5273record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@user3632210055192record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@petronelfilipciu55114record ↗
17 Sep17 SepC@cristinabianca874785record ↗
17 Sep17 SepC@cristinabianca874642record ↗
3 Sep3 SepC@sophianewsplus4572record ↗
9 Sep10 SepC@sophianewsplus4541record ↗
20 Sep20 SepC@user3632210054375record ↗
14 Sep14 SepC@user3632210054213record ↗
25 Aug25 AugC@sophianewsplus3902record ↗
16 Sep16 SepC@cristinabianca873901record ↗
10 Sep10 SepC@veneravivi773855record ↗
9 Sep11 SepC@haurtradatorideneam3832record ↗
18 Sep20 SepC@dragomirc13592record ↗
13 Sep13 SepC@sophianewsplus3551record ↗
13 Sep14 SepC@bodigoardu3511record ↗
5 Sep6 SepC@user2397872373422record ↗
26 Aug26 AugC@sophianewsplus3412record ↗
13 Sep13 SepC@vocesiritm3349record ↗
22 Sep22 SepC@magiacitatelorfru3347record ↗
16 Sep17 SepC@ghitaboca153246record ↗
20 Sep20 SepC@sophianewsplus3220record ↗
28 Aug29 AugC@sophianewsplus3200record ↗
2 Sep2 SepC@lucastefanzoltan3152record ↗
18 Sep18 SepC@carinaanamaria13116record ↗
11 Sep11 SepC@user3632210053073record ↗
25 Sep25 SepC@european.federali12952record ↗
17 Sep18 SepC@gs.cg02781record ↗
14 Sep15 SepC@russia.8.8.3.tony2714record ↗
13 Sep13 SepC@vocesiritm25311record ↗
15 Sep16 SepC@gs.cg02522record ↗
1 Sep1 SepC@sophianewsplus2491record ↗
25 Aug25 AugC@mihaela.ungheanu712319record ↗
9 Sep9 SepC@valentina.007.ro2234record ↗
16 Sep16 SepC@simonacovasda2212record ↗
12 Sep12 SepC@sophianewsplus2090record ↗
1 Sep1 SepC@danielfiudedac1965record ↗
10 Sep11 SepC@valentina.007.ro1842record ↗
14 Sep14 SepC@ionelatrasca3631814record ↗
14 Sep15 SepC@russia.8.8.3.tony1797record ↗
4 Sep5 SepC@mihaela.ungheanu711600record ↗
14 Sep14 SepC@ionelatrasca3631385record ↗
19 Sep19 SepC@simonacovasda1115record ↗
28 Aug29 AugC@sophianewsplus1100record ↗
20 Sep20 SepC@alexunikulcuk1070record ↗
16 Sep16 SepC@simonacovasda1061record ↗
1 Sep1 SepC@lucastefanzoltan1011record ↗
29 Aug30 AugC@8888_angel1000record ↗
31 Aug1 SepC@mihaela.ungheanu71871record ↗
30 Aug30 AugC@cgro06840record ↗
13 Sep14 SepC@alina.1503780record ↗
3 Sep4 SepC@dumitra.preda640record ↗
31 Aug31 AugC@danielfiudedac563record ↗
9 Sep9 SepC@sophianewsplus561record ↗
9 Sep9 SepC@8888_angel480record ↗
3 Sep3 SepC@8888_angel390record ↗
3 Sep3 SepC@8888_angel390record ↗
3 Sep3 SepC@8888_angel300record ↗
10 Sep10 SepC@8888_angel300record ↗
3 Sep3 SepC@8888_angel240record ↗
11 Sep11 SepC@sophianewsplus210record ↗
10 Sep10 SepC@8888_angel180record ↗
4 Sep4 SepC@8888_angel80record ↗

Views and comments: at capture. Tier A: the slogan; B: the same frame; C: context.

Method and limitations

Qriton · “Russia is not my enemy” analysis